Flip Classroom in a University: Methodological Aspects and Implementation Results
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
Flip classroom, as a pedagogical model that shifts the delivery of theoretical material to an online environment and the in-person learning experience to the active application of knowledge, is becoming increasingly popular in universities. This article examines key methodological aspects of implementing flip classrooms: designing online components, organizing in-person classes, the role of the instructor, and motivation and assessment systems. The results of implementing the model in Russian and international universities are analyzed: increased student engagement, development of critical thinking, improved academic performance, and the development of independent study skills. Particular attention is given to barriers such as digital unpreparedness, resistance from students and instructors, and organizational constraints, as well as the conditions for successful implementation. It is emphasized that the effectiveness of flip learning is determined not by its form, but by the quality of the pedagogical design and its focus on the development of the student as a learning subject.

Keywords:
flip learning, flipped classroom, active learning methods, hybrid learning, instructional design, student engagement, independent work, higher education
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Dumina E. V. Obrazovatel'nyy potencial pedagogicheskoy modeli «Perevernutoe obuchenie» v usloviyah inoyazychnoy podgotovki studentov neyazykovogo vuza // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. № 17 (815). S. 26−35.

2. Agavelyan R.O., Kobeleva E.P., Stuchinskaya E.A., Dushinina E.V. Ispol'zovanie mnemotehnik v processe professional'no-orientirovannoy inoyazychnoy podgotovki studentovekonomistov // Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. 2022. № 4. S. 38-50.

3. Lyzhin A.I. Institut nastavnichestva kak tehnologiya privlecheniya i podgotovki novyh rabochih kadrov // Innovacionnaya nauchnaya sovremennaya akademicheskaya issledovatel'skaya traektoriya (INSAYT). – 2020. – № 1 (1). – S. 15–24.

4. Sorokova M. G. Elektronnyy kurs kak cifrovoy obrazovatel'nyy resurs smeshannogo obucheniya v usloviyah vysshego obrazovaniya // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2020. T. 25, № 1. S. 36–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250104

5. Sessiya «Molodezh'-2030. Obraz buduschego». Prezident Rossii. [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/55890.

6. Stepanova L.N. Soft skills kak prediktory zhiznennogo samoosuschestvleniya studentov // Obrazovanie i nauka. – 2019. – T. 21. – № 8. – C. 65–89

7. Kazanceva O. Yu., Levina I. D. Emocional'no-psihologicheskaya ustoychivost' kak komponent pedagogicheskoy kompetentnosti buduschih uchiteley // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. – 2025. – № 2. – S. 53–61.

8. Pahomova N. Yu. Razvitie refleksivnoy kompetentnosti studentov pedagogicheskih napravleniy podgotovki // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2024. – № 6. – S. 88–95.

9. Slastenin V. A., Isaev I. F., Shiyanov E. N. Pedagogika: professional'naya kompetentnost' pedagoga v usloviyah sovremennyh vyzovov : ucheb. posobie. – M. : Akademiya, 2024. – 256 s.

10. Yumova C. Zh., Yumov I. B. Puti formirovaniya i povysheniya uchebnoy motivacii // Pedagogicheskie tehnologii dlya realizacii sovremennyh obrazovatel'nyh standartov: sb. st. mezhdunar. nauch.-metod. konf. Ulan-Ude, 2021. S. 100–103.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?