graduate student
The article examines the qualitative transformation of technological cooperation models in the Russian oil and gas sector under the influence of sanctions restrictions in 2014–2024. Based on the synthesis of neo-institutional theory and the resource-based view, the author develops and proposes an original institutional matrix of technological cooperation. This matrix classifies forms of interaction according to two key criteria: the type of good created (private, club, public) and the leading coordination subject (market, firm, state). The thesis about the formation of a qualitatively new institutional model – the public-private technological partnership (PPTP) – is substantiated. This model possesses maximum resilience to changes in the external environment and is focused on creating public goods in the sphere of technological sovereignty. Empirical verification of the matrix using specific technological areas (hydraulic fracturing technologies, rotary steerable systems, software, liquefied natural gas projects) confirmed a shift in cooperation trajectories from market-based forms towards quasi-integrative institutions and PPTP. It is concluded that the new cooperation architecture is not a temporary adaptive measure but a long-term structural one, laying the foundation for a new industry development model up to 2030.
oil and gas complex, technology transfer, technological cooperation, sanctions, technological sovereignty, public-private technological partnership
1. Uil'yamson O.I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktaciya. – SPb.: Lenizdat, 1996. – 702 s.
2. Barney J.B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage // Journal of Management. – 1991. – Vol. 17, No. 1. – P. 99-120.
3. Galickaya Yu.N., Kuzhim K.M. Razvitie neftegazovogo sektora v usloviyah sankciy // Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. – 2025. – № 3 (121). – S. 56-60.
4. Kryukov V.A. Neftegazovyy kompleks: institucional'nye aspekty razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN, 2021. – 364 s.
5. Petrenko V.E. Razvitie tehnologiy gidrorazryva plasta v Rossii: tekuschee sostoyanie i vyzovy // Neftyanoe hozyaystvo. – 2023. – № 5. – S. 34-39.
6. Tehnologicheskiy transfer v TEK: modeli i mehanizmy / otv. red. I.A. Solov'eva. – SPb.: Nauka, 2020. – 198 s.
7. Buchanan J.M. An Economic Theory of Clubs // Economica. – 1965. – Vol. 32, No. 125. – P. 1–14.
8. Dmitrieva D., Romasheva N. Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations // Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. – 2020. – Vol. 8, Issue 12. – 1003.
9. Powell W.W. Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization // Research in Organizational Behavior. – 1990. – Vol. 12. – P. 295-336.
10. Samuelson P.A. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure // Review of Economics and Statistics. – 1954. – Vol. 36, No. 4. – P. 387-389.
11. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. – New York: Free Press, 1985. – 450 p.
12. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management // Strategic Management Journal. – 1997. – Vol. 18, No. 7. – P. 509–533.
13. Rafikova S.Y. Sanctions and global supply chains: challenges and opportunities // Mezhdunarodnyy nauchnyy zhurnal «Vestnik nauki». – 2025. – T. 8, № 8 (89). – S. 8–15.
14. Samylovskaya E., Makhovikov A., Lutonin A., Medvedev D., Kudryavtseva R.-E. Digital Technologies in Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Extraction: Global Trends and Russian Experience // Resources. – 2022. – Vol. 11, No. 3. – 29. – URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/3/29 (data obrascheniya: 10.03.2026).
15. Pascual C. Geopolitical fragmentation is reshaping global energy markets // S&P Global / Zawya. 2025. — URL: https://www.zawya.com/projects/oil-and-gas/geopolitical-fragmentation-is-reshaping-global-energy-markets-s-and-p-global-svp-yjkpuyg1 (data obrascheniya: 10.03.2026).
