employee
This article substantiates the methodological significance of production and cooperative linkages as a systemic factor in shaping the economic performance of enterprises within the industrial complex. It is demonstrated that under conditions of increasing technological complexity and institutional constraints, a firm’s economic performance is determined not only by its internal production parameters but also by the configuration and quality of its cooperative interactions. An integrated model for assessing operational efficiency is developed, incorporating three interrelated blocks: economic performance indicators, cooperative linkage characteristics, and sustainability and reproduction capacity parameters. The model is empirically tested using publicly disclosed reporting data from JSC «Kalashnikov Concern», PJSC «United Aircraft Corporation», and the State Corporation «Rosatom». The findings confirm the hypothesis that the cooperative contour represents an independent and structurally significant channel in the formation of economic effects within industrial enterprises.
production cooperation, industrial complex, defense-industrial complex, mechanical engineering, nuclear industry, transaction costs, resource-based view, value chain, integral index, economic performance
1. Afanas'ev M.P. Klasternaya politika i razvitie promyshlennosti regiona // Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2015. № 13. S. 2-12.
2. Bodrunov S.D. Novaya industrializaciya i formirovanie promyshlennoy politiki Rossii. SPb.: INIR im. S.Yu. Vitte, 2013. 336 s.
3. Glaz'ev S.Yu. Strategiya operezhayuschego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyah global'nogo krizisa. M.: Ekonomika, 2010. 256 s.
4. Isaev M. G., Spil'nichenko V. K. Razrabotka nauchno obosnovannyh predlozheniy po metodam i indikatoram ocenki effektivnosti upravleniya cifrovoy transformaciey ekonomicheskih biznes-sistem // Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo. 2023.№11/2. -S. 20-25 DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2974.2023.11-2.11
5. Kleyner G.B. Sistemnaya ekonomika i promyshlennoe razvitie // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 2011. № 3. S. 7–23.
6. Tatarkin A.I., Romanova O.A. Promyshlennaya politika: genezis, regional'nye osobennosti i zakonodatel'noe obespechenie // Ekonomika regiona. 2014. № 2. S. 9-21.
7. Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage // Journal of Management. 1991. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 99-120.
8. Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. 1937. Vol. 4. No. 16. P. 386-405.
9. Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985. 557 p.
10. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985. 450 p.
11. World Bank. World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. 289 p.
12. Fomin, O. S., Spilnichenko, V. K., Salimova, G. A., Nigmatullina, G. R., & Nadzhafova, M. N. (2021). Features of the formation of incomes of the consolidated budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Amazonia Investiga, 10(48), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.48.12.27
