The article analyzes the problem of recidivism among persons serving sentences in the UFIC in the form of forced labor. Despite efforts to humanize criminal legislation and introduce alternative punishments, the rate of repeat offenses remains high, which indicates the lack of effectiveness of existing preventive measures and the rehabilitation of convicts. The potential of UFIC in the prevention of relapse is not fully realized due to insufficient individualization of the educational process. When working with convicts, traditional pedagogical tools are often used that do not take into account personal characteristics, life experience and the reasons for committing crimes. In this regard, the development and implementation of individual education programs, including comprehensive personality diagnostics, identification of psychological characteristics, life values and professional competencies, as well as the organization of purposeful educational and psychological-pedagogical work, is of particular importance. The introduction of individual education programs in the activities of the UFIC contributes to the realization of the potential of forced labor as an alternative to isolation from society and is a condition for improving the effectiveness of correctional institutions in preventing new crimes and returning citizens to a full life in society after release.
rehabilitation of convicts, crime prevention, recidivism, individual education programs
1. MVD Rossii publikuet statisticheskuyu informaciyu o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii za 2024 god // Ministerstvo vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii: oficial'nyy sayt. Moskva, 2025. URL: MVD Rossii publikuet statisticheskuyu informaciyu o sostoyanii prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii za 2024 god (data obrascheniya: 20.04.2026).
2. Social'nyy portret prestupnosti: portal pravovoy statistiki // General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federacii : oficial'nyy sayt. URL: http://crimestat.ru/ social_portrait (data obrascheniya: 13.04.2026).
3. Avdeeva E.V. Aktual'nye voprosy realizacii prinuditel'nyh rabot v usloviyah reformy ugolovnogo i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo zakonodatel'stva // Advokatskaya praktika. 2020. № 3. S. 21-25.
4. Ol'hovik N. V. Recidivnaya prestupnost' osuzhdennyh, otbyvayuschih prinuditel'nye raboty // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. 2021. № 1 (46). S. 45-53.
5. Byakina S. I. Vospitatel'naya i profilakticheskaya rabota s osuzhdennymi k prinuditel'nym rabotam: pravovye aspekty // Vedomosti UIS. 2024. № 6. S. 47-54.
6. Golodov P. V. Probaciya v Rossiyskoy Federacii: nekotorye problemy soderzhaniya i pravovoy reglamentacii // Penitenciarnaya nauka. 2022. T. 16. № 2 (58). S. 194–203.
7. Kashuba Yu. A. Vozmozhnosti sozdaniya sistemy ispravitel'nyh centrov // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. 2018. Tom 26 (1-4), № 1. S. 11-15.
8. Verina G.V. Novye konceptual'nye podhody k voprosam prestupleniya i nakazaniya v rossiyskoy ugolovno-pravovoy politike // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 5. S. 55-59.
9. Bastrykin A. I., Sal'nikov V. P., Romanovskaya V. B., Voronkov K. I. Antikriminogennaya resocializaciya: zarubezhnyy opyt // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. T. 14. № 3. S. 371–378.
10. Gorshkova N. A., Zezyulina T. A., Tarakanov I. A. Specifika ugolovno-pravovogo reagirovaniya na pravonarushayuschee povedenie lic, otbyvayuschih nakazanie v vide prinuditel'nyh rabot // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2021. №2. S. 121-125.
