Methodological basis of assessing the effectiveness of various types of organizations have traditionally attracted considerable attention in the scientific community. Assessing specific types of organizations, such as development institutions, is particularly challenging due to the lack of consensus regarding the particular criteria that will determine whether such an institution is functioning effectively. Based on the analysis and synthesis of various authors’ positions, this article examines scientific and expert approaches to assessing the effectiveness of development institutions as economic entities. This approach to assessing the effectiveness of these institutions is quite widespread in both theoretical and practical terms, although it is not the only one. The study concludes that the choice of a specific methodology should be determined based on the organization’s goals and operating conditions.
development institution, effectiveness, economic entity, assessment methodology
1. Kuzenkova V.M. Sovremennye podhody k ocenke effektivnosti institutov razvitiya // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. 2020. № 3 (90). S. 19-33.
2. Ocenka effektivnosti deyatel'nosti rossiyskih i zarubezhnyh institutov razvitiya: nauchnyy doklad / pod red. I.N. Rykovoy. – M.: Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy finansovyy institut, 2016. – 204 s.
3. Perfilova O.V. Ocenka effektivnosti rossiyskih finansovyh institutov razvitiya // Rol' i znachenie sovremennoy nauki i tehniki dlya razvitiya obschestva: sbornik statey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii: v 3 ch. – Ekaterinburg: Omega Sayns, 2017. – S. 145-147.
4. Sidorova E.N., Tatarkin D.A. Instituty razvitiya kak instrument realizacii gosudarstvennoy investicionnoy politiki: analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya, ocenka rezul'tativnosti // Vestnik URFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2016. T. 15. № 4. S. 506-528.
5. Suharev O.S. Instituty razvitiya: neobhodimost' i effektivnost' // Gosudarstvennyy audit. Pravo. Ekonomika. 2017. № 2. S. 8-16.
6. Yudina V.I. Instituty innovacionnogo razvitiya: problemy metodiki ocenki effektivnosti // Innovacionnoe razvitie – ot Shumpetera do nashih dney: ekonomika i obrazovanie: sbornik nauchnyh statey po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – M.: Nauchnyy konsul'tant, 2015. – S. 478-482.
7. Bridging Global Infrastructure Gaps. – McKinsey & Company, June 2016. – 45 p.
8. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-Based Management. – 2nd ed. [DCD/DAC/EV(2022)2]. – DAC Network of Development Evaluation. – 30 p.
9. OECD DAC Evaluation Criteria: Summary of consultation responses. – The DAC Network of Development Evaluation, Nov. 2018. – 17 p.
10. Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance [OCDE/GD(91)208]. – Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Development Assistance Committee, 1991. – 11 p.
11. Rajaram A., Le T.M., Biletska N., Brumby L. A Diagnostic Framework for Assessing Public Investment Management: Policy Research Working Paper № 5397. – Washington, DC: The World Bank, Aug. 2010. – 21 p.
12. The Power of Public Investment Management: Transforming Resources into Assets for Growth: Directions in Development – Public Sector Governance № 91158 / ed. by A. Rajaram, T.M. Le, K. Kaiser, J.-H. Kim, J. Frank. – Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2014. – 182 p.
