The article is devoted to the current problems of minors convicted of paying a fine, including when they do not have the material and property resources to do so. Despite the detailed study of this issue in the doctrine, there are significant difficulties in implementing the mechanism of collecting fines from both minors and their parents or legal representatives in accordance with the provisions of Part 2 of Article 88 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, according to which a fine imposed on a minor convicted person may be collected from their parents or other legal representatives with their consent. The author provides and analyzes examples from judicial practice of collecting a court fine from the parents of a minor, which make it possible to judge the promotion of educational influence on a teenager and the achievement of the goals of punishment in the form of correcting the convicted person and preventing the commission of new crimes. At the same time, the article notes that this approach should be implemented only under certain conditions stipulated by the author. In conclusion, it is concluded that there is a need for an integrated approach to solving the identified problems in order to ensure the effectiveness of the execution of punishment and achieve its goals in relation to juvenile convicts, in connection with which the author suggests a number of measures to improve the current legislation on the issue under consideration.
sentencing, juvenile convicts, criminal liability, educational influence, the principle of personal responsibility, the goals of criminal punishment, the principle of personal responsibility, the collection of fines, and the legal representatives of minors
1. Arefinkina E.G. Individualizaciya naznacheniya nakazaniya nesovershennoletnim : dis. ... kandidata yuridicheskih nauk. M., 2009. 223 s.
2. Ashin A.A. Nakazanie nesovershennoletnih za hischenie chuzhogo imuschestva. Vladimir : VYuI Minyusta Rossii, 2004. 155 s.
3. Glushkov A.I. Problemy naznacheniya ugolovnyh nakazaniy v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Nauka i shkola. 2017. № 2. S. 9-14.
4. Knyazeva E.A., Dubinskaya Yu. V. Shtraf v sisteme nakazaniya nesovershennoletnih - problemy vzyskaniya // Zakon i pravo. 2022. № 8. S. 169-172.
5. Lyubavina M.A. Kommentariy k postanovleniyu Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoy praktike primeneniya zakonodatel'stva, reglamentiruyuschego osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnih» ot 01.02.2011 № 1. SPb.: Akademiya General'noy prokuratury RF, 2012. 104 s.
6. Modeckiy Yu. Ugolovnyy zakon k nesovershennoletnim dolzhen byt' gumanen //Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2001. № 12.
7. Olovencova S.Yu. Shtraf kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya, primenyaemyy k nesovershennoletnim // Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy. 2013. №. 2 (129). S 48-49.
8. Petrova O.N. Naznachenie ugolovnogo nakazaniya nesovershennoletnim (ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty). dis. ... k.yu.n. Krasnodar, 2004. 193 s.
9. Prozumentov L.M. Ugolovno-pravovaya ohrana i otvetstvennost' nesovershenno-letnih v Rossiyskoy Federacii. Tomsk : Izdatel'skiy Dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017. 305 s.
10. Tatarnikova T.G. Problemy naznacheniya nakazaniya nesovershennoletnim v vide shtrafa // Aktual'nye problemy pravovoy nauki: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno- prakticheskoy konferencii. Ufa: Aeterna, 2014. S. 48-51.
