employee
employee
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the system of pre-trial dispute settlement in the Russian Federation. Two key forms of out-of-court conflict resolution are considered: the traditional grievance procedure and the modern institution of mediation. Their regulatory framework, legal nature, application procedure, effectiveness and place in the legal system are analyzed. Based on statistical data, analysis of judicial practice and opinion polls, the strengths and weaknesses of each procedure are identified. Special attention is paid to the problems of the formalism of the claims procedure and barriers to the development of mediation. The article formulates proposals for improving legislation and law enforcement practice aimed at harmonizing pre-trial procedures and increasing their effectiveness.
pre-trial settlement, claims procedure, mediation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), efficiency, legal regulation
1. Arbitrazhnyy processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 24.07.2002 №95-FZ (red. ot 15.12.2025) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2026) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012.
2. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 №51-FZ (red. ot 31.07.2025, s izm. ot 25.03.2026) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.08.2025) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3302.
3. Grazhdanskiy processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii" ot 14.11.2002 №138-FZ (red. ot 23.03.2026, s izm. ot 31.03.2026) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2002. № 46. St. 4536.
4. Zhilischnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 29.12.2004 №188-FZ (red. ot 20.02.2026) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2005. № 1 (chast' I). St. 14.
5. Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 №193-FZ (red. ot 26.07.2019) «Ob al'ternativnoy procedure uregulirovaniya sporov s uchastiem posrednika (procedure mediacii)» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2010. № 31. St. 4155.
6. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30.12.2004 №214-FZ (red. ot 09.04.2026) «Ob uchastii v dolevom stroitel'stve mnogokvartirnyh domov i inyh ob'ektov nedvizhimosti i o vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2005. № 1 (chast' I). St. 4.
7. Vasil'eva Yu.V. Funkcii pretenzionnogo poryadka kak dosudebnogo sposoba razresheniya pravovogo konflikta // Novaya nauka: ot idei k rezul'tatu. - 2025. - №4. - S. 113-121.
8. Domashevskaya E.V. Dosudebnyy poryadok uregulirovaniya grazhdansko-pravovyh sporov // Ohrana i zaschita prav i zakonnyh interesov v sovremennom prave. Sbornik statey po rezul'tatam III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. Simferopol', 2024. - S. 527-532.
9. Novikov A.V. K voprosu o dosudebnom poryadke uregulirovaniya ekonomicheskih sporov // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2023. - T. 13. - №1-2-1. - S. 240-246.
10. Ovchinnikov Yu.G. Poryadok ispol'zovaniya elektronnyh dokumentov v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Zakonnost'. - 2024. - №5 - (1075). - S. 57-60.
11. Fedorov A.A. Pravovaya priroda instituta dosudebnogo poryadka v grazhdanskopravovyh sporah // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2024. - T. 14. -№4-1. - S. 446-453.
12. Yakushev R.V. Obzor obschego poryadka i aktual'nyh problem pravovogo instituta dosudebnogo razbiratel'stva v Rossii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. - 2024.-№10 (238). - S. 269-271.
